<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arizona First Amendment Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arizonafoi.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arizonafoi.com</link>
	<description>Supporting freedom of the press and open government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Previously censored article printed after high school paper, administration reach compromise</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2010/02/previously-censored-article-printed-after-high-school-paper-administration-reach-compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2010/02/previously-censored-article-printed-after-high-school-paper-administration-reach-compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 

After a ten-month censorship battle with the Glendale Union High School District, Thunderbird High School&#8217;s student newspaper, The Challenge, published and distributed a previously censored article.

The article about the district&#8217;s teacher assessment testing was set to publish on May 8, 2009, and is now in the Feb. 12 of The Challenge, along with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></p>
<div>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 152px"><span><span><img title="Thunderbird High School" src="http://thunderbird.guhsdaz.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_757759/Image/theme/logo.jpg" alt="Thunderbird High School" width="142" height="199" /></span></span><p class="wp-caption-text">Thunderbird High School</p></div>
<p>After a ten-month censorship battle with the Glendale Union High School District, Thunderbird High School&#8217;s student newspaper, <em>The Challenge</em>, published and distributed a previously censored article.</p>
</div>
<div>The article about the district&#8217;s teacher assessment testing was set to publish on May 8, 2009, and is now in the Feb. 12 of <em>The Challenge</em>, along with the district&#8217;s response.</div>
<div>Negotiations took place between student editors and administrators to publish the original article and the district&#8217;s response after a long appeals process.</div>
<div><a href="http://www.splc.org/newsflash.asp?id=2036" target="_blank">Read more from the SPLC&#8230;</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2010/02/previously-censored-article-printed-after-high-school-paper-administration-reach-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nationwide study shows subpoenas increasing, impacting newsgathering</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/08/nationwide-study-shows-subpoenas-increasing-impacting-newsgathering/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/08/nationwide-study-shows-subpoenas-increasing-impacting-newsgathering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsgathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subpoena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A large-scale empirical study of media subpoenas, to be published this year in Washington Law Review, suggests that the problem of media subpoenas is on the increase and that the receipt of a subpoena can seriously impact the newsgathering process. It also suggests that journalists are poorly informed of their own legal protection.
Read more at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large-scale empirical study of media subpoenas, to be published this year in Washington Law Review, suggests that the problem of media subpoenas is on the increase and that the receipt of a subpoena can seriously impact the newsgathering process. It also suggests that journalists are poorly informed of their own legal protection.</p>
<p>Read more at http://www.spj.org/convention/handouts/jail-time.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/08/nationwide-study-shows-subpoenas-increasing-impacting-newsgathering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amicus Brief in metadata case</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/amicus-brief-in-metadata-case/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/amicus-brief-in-metadata-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amicus Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here to read the amicus brief that was filed in the Arizona Supreme Court on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, the Society of Professional Journalists and the Arizona Newspapers Association in Lake v. City of Phoenix. I think the brief turned out well and many thanks to Professor Steve Doig at ASU’s Cronkite School [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ananews.com/flyers/amicus_brief2009.pdf">Click here to read the amicus brief that was filed in the Arizona Supreme Court on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, the Society of Professional Journalists and the Arizona Newspapers Association in</a><em><a href="http://www.ananews.com/flyers/amicus_brief2009.pdf"> Lake v. City of Phoenix</a>.</em> I think the brief turned out well and many thanks to Professor <a href="http://twitter.com/sdoig" target="_blank">Steve Doig</a> at <a href="http://cronkite.asu.edu/">ASU’s Cronkite School </a>for his invaluable assistance.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/sedona-reporter-tests-rule-122/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Sedona reporter tests Rule 122'>Sedona reporter tests Rule 122</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/amicus-brief-in-metadata-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great quote</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/great-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/great-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

If people don’t enforce their rights, they lose them.
— Dan Barr



Related posts:Great quote
Great quote
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;">
<blockquote>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 159px"><img title="Photo of Dan Barr" src="http://arizonalawchannel.com/storage/2132065_1.jpg" alt="Photo of Dan Barr" width="149" height="180" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Dann Barr</p></div>
<p>If people don’t enforce their rights, they lose them.</p></blockquote>
<p><cite>— Dan Barr</cite></p>
</div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-3/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Great quote'>Great quote</a></li>
<li><a href='http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Great quote'>Great quote</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/great-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sedona reporter tests Rule 122</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/sedona-reporter-tests-rule-122/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/sedona-reporter-tests-rule-122/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tommy Acosta, editor of the Sedona Times and a freelance writer for Sedona.biz, has been ordered by the Sedona Magistrate Court to show cause why he should not be found in “indirect civil contempt” for allegedly videotaping a court proceeding.
Jennifer S. Paetkau, an assistant city attorney for the City of Sedona, alleges that Mr. Acosta, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy Acosta, editor of the Sedona Times and a freelance writer for Sedona.biz, has been ordered by the Sedona Magistrate Court to show cause why he should not be found in “indirect civil contempt” for allegedly videotaping a court proceeding.</p>
<p>Jennifer S. Paetkau, an assistant city attorney for the City of Sedona, alleges that Mr. Acosta, while attending a driving-with-suspended-license Arraignment proceeding for Melinda Arnold June 17 at the City Council Chamber, with the knowledge of the defendant, videotaped the proceeding without permission from the court, therefore violating Rule 122(f) of the Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://arizonafoi.com/2008/12/final-report-on-rule-123/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Final Report on Rule 123'>Final Report on Rule 123</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/sedona-reporter-tests-rule-122/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ariz. appeals court rules metadata aren’t public records</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/01/ariz-appeals-court-rules-metadata-aren%e2%80%99t-public-records/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/01/ariz-appeals-court-rules-metadata-aren%e2%80%99t-public-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A divided Arizona appellate court has ruled that hidden electronic data that indicate how and when documents are produced with word-processing computer programs aren’t themselves public records. Read more: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/press/information/news.aspx?id=21130
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A divided Arizona appellate court has ruled that hidden electronic data that indicate how and when documents are produced with word-processing computer programs aren’t themselves public records. Read more: <a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/press/information/news.aspx?id=21130">http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/press/information/news.aspx?id=21130</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2009/01/ariz-appeals-court-rules-metadata-aren%e2%80%99t-public-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Report on Rule 123</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/12/final-report-on-rule-123/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/12/final-report-on-rule-123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coutroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule 123, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, governs public access to records maintained by the judiciary. The foundation of the Rule is that court records should be open to everyone. But exactly what information should be available to the public online for individual cases? Should certain users be authorized to directly access case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule 123, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, governs public access to records maintained by the judiciary. The foundation of the Rule is that court records should be open to everyone. But exactly what information should be available to the public online for individual cases? Should certain users be authorized to directly access case management databases in real time, such as government agencies, government contractors, commercial agencies subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the news media, or research organizations? If so, what standards and processes are needed to qualify for such access? The Advisory Committee on Supreme Court Rule 123 and Data Dissemination examines these and other issues in their final report: <a href="http://supreme.state.az.us/Rule123/Rule%20123%20%20DDA%20Committee%20Report%20v4.pdf">http://supreme.state.az.us/Rule123/Rule%20123%20%20DDA%20Committee%20Report%20v4.pdf</a>.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://arizonafoi.com/2009/07/sedona-reporter-tests-rule-122/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Sedona reporter tests Rule 122'>Sedona reporter tests Rule 122</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/12/final-report-on-rule-123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great quote</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-3/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it&#8217;s government business, it&#8217;s public business.
—Dave Cuillier
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://journalism.arizona.edu/people/faculty/images/cuillier_new.jpg"><img class="alignleft" title="Dave Cuillier" src="http://journalism.arizona.edu/people/faculty/images/cuillier_new.jpg" alt="Dave Cuillier" width="130" height="190" /></a>If it&#8217;s government business, it&#8217;s public business.</p>
<p>—Dave Cuillier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great quote</title>
		<link>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-2/</link>
		<comments>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonafoi.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public records aren&#8217;t just about the media &#8212; it&#8217;s about the public.
— Laurie Roberts
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.azcentral.com/members/User/LaurieRoberts"><img class="alignleft" title="Laurie Roberts" src="http://s.azcentral.com/home/File-/picture/76400/1/0/150/1024/" alt="Laurie Roberts" width="150" height="113" /></a>Public records aren&#8217;t just about the media &#8212; it&#8217;s about the public.</p>
<p><em><cite>— Laurie Roberts</cite></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arizonafoi.com/2008/04/great-quote-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
